Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Capital.com vs Trading 212

Capital.com scores 9.3 and Trading 212 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Capital.com

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Trading 212

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Where Capital.com and Trading 212 differ

Capital.com vs Trading 212
Compare
Capital.comCapital.com
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Trading 212
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£20£1Lower
Stock trade fee$0£0
MarketsStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs, Crypto, Bonds, Spread bettingCovers moreStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs
RegulatorsFCA, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)Financial Conduct Authority, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
PlatformsWeb platform, Mobile app, MT4, TradingViewTrading 212 App, Web Platform
Retail accounts that lose money65%Not confirmed
Deposit and withdrawal feesFree deposits and withdrawalsNot confirmed
Account typesNot confirmedISA, SIPP, Joint
Maximum retail leverage1:30Not confirmed

Same on both: Account fee (£0), Inactivity fee (£0), Investor protection (FSCS up to GBP 85,000).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Regulators: only Capital.com offers FCA.
  • Regulators: only Trading 212 offers Financial Conduct Authority, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Founded is lower at Trading 212: 2006 vs 2016.
  • Minimum deposit is lower at Trading 212: £1 vs £20.
  • Markets: only Capital.com offers Crypto, Bonds, Spread betting.
  • Platforms: only Capital.com offers Mobile app, MT4, TradingView.
  • Platforms: only Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App.
  • Features: only Trading 212 offers Fractional shares.
  • Pricing model: only Capital.com offers Low fees.

Our verdict on each

Capital.com

Capital.com suits traders who want one account across shares, forex, CFDs, crypto and bonds without a monthly or inactivity charge. UK clients sit under FCA regulation with FSCS protection of FSCS up to GBP 85,000. The minimum deposit of £20 is the only cost barrier, above CFI at $0.

Read the full Capital.com review

Trading 212

Trading 212 suits UK and European beginners who want flat costs: a stock trade fee of £0, an account fee of £0 and an ISA, SIPP and joint account. Forex and CFDs share the same menu, so the easy entry is the reason to look closer, not to trade heavily.

Read the full Trading 212 review

Score breakdown

Capital.com vs Trading 212
AreaCapital.comTrading 212
Cost9.2Account fee of £0, stock trade fee of $0 and no inactivity charge, with free deposits and withdrawals.9.3HigherCharges sit at the floor: £0 on a trade, £0 on the account, £0 when idle.
Offer9.5Higher9.2
Trust9.19.5Higher

How they place

Capital.com vs Trading 212
RankingCapital.comTrading 212
Stock and ETF brokers56 of 49074 of 490
Forex brokers25 of 14732 of 147
Low-spread forex brokers23 of 14530 of 145
CFD brokers20 of 12225 of 122
Low-fee brokers7 of 119 of 11

Side by side, item by item

Capital.com vs Trading 212
MarketsCapital.comTrading 212
StocksYesYes
ETFsYesYes
ForexYesYes
CFDsYesYes
CryptoYesNo
BondsYesNo
Spread bettingYesNo

Availability and regulation

Capital.com vs Trading 212
CountryCapital.comTrading 212
Cyprus
CySEC HE 354252
United Kingdom
FCA 793714

Every fact side by side

Capital.com vs Trading 212
FactCapital.comTrading 212
FeaturesDemo account, Mobile appFractional shares, Demo account, Mobile appCovers more
Pricing modelCommission free, Low feesCovers moreCommission free
AudienceNot confirmedBeginners
Legal entityCAPITAL VAULT LTDTrading 212 Markets Ltd
HeadquartersCyprusCyprus
Founded20162006Lower
Support channelsChat, Help centreNot confirmed

Where each stands against the rest

Capital.com vs Trading 212
FactCapital.comTrading 212Median
Minimum deposit£20below the median£1lowest quarter£25
Account fee£0at the median£0at the median£0
Retail accounts that lose money65%lowest quarterNot confirmed70.375%

Median across 38 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Capital.com

Pros

  • No account fee at all, which puts it joint first on that measure in our data (£0).
  • No inactivity charge, also joint first in our data, so an unused balance is not quietly billed (£0).
  • Stock trades cost $0 under a commission-free model.

Cons

  • The minimum deposit of £20 is far higher than CFI, which asks for $0.
  • Support runs on chat and help centre, so there is no phone line for questions about a leveraged position.
  • Retail accounts lose 65% of money, and the market is open around the clock.

Trading 212

Pros

  • Nothing to pay for holding or for going quiet: the account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0.
  • Trading shares costs £0, the same stock trade fee eToro lists at $0, so the trade price is not the reason to move.
  • The entry of £1 sits under the $5 Vantage asks for, which matters for a first transfer.

Cons

  • The market list pairs shares and ETFs with forex and CFDs in stocks, etfs and forex, so a platform aimed at beginners, beginners, also carries leveraged products.
  • The fee sheet is the easy part: retail accounts lose money at 70.15% across the brokers compared, and a £0 trade cost does not remove that risk.
  • The money side runs through Trading 212 Markets Ltd in Cyprus, registered with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission as MiCA CASP 21380045KC28948FNE32, so a UK saver is dealing with a Cyprus entity alongside the UK one.

Who each suits

Capital.com

Who it suits

  • Traders who want shares, forex, CFDs, crypto and bonds in one account
  • UK residents who want FSCS protection alongside a CySEC regulated entity
  • People who keep a balance and would otherwise pay inactivity fees

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro, if you want a social platform with copy trading
  • Vantage, if you would rather start from a smaller deposit of $5

Trading 212

Who it suits

  • Beginners and small regular investors who want a low bar to entry, since the minimum deposit is £1 and the app and demo account in fractional shares, demo account and mobile app support a cautious start.
  • UK and European savers who care about holding cost, because the account fee of £0 and the inactivity fee of £0 leave the account free to sit and free to open.
  • Savers who want a tax-wrapped and shared holding together, since isa, sipp and joint covers an ISA, a SIPP and a joint account under one provider.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Not for forex and CFD traders who want a deeper market list: Trading 212 stops at stocks, etfs and forex, while eToro and Vantage cover more of the leveraged side.
  • Not for anyone who needs a no-cost opening: CFI takes a minimum deposit of $0 against the £1 asked here.
  • Not for savers who want a bigger spread of wrappers: the account range is listed as isa, sipp and joint, which does not stretch to every tax-sheltered account type.

Questions about each

Capital.com

What is the minimum deposit at Capital.com?+

The minimum deposit is £20 in the UK. That is higher than CFI at $0 and Vantage at $5. Clients who want a smaller opening balance may prefer a rival on that measure.

What does it cost to open and hold an account?+

There is no account fee, so the account costs £0. There is also no inactivity charge, at £0. Both rank the brand joint first on our data, so an unused balance is not billed.

Trading 212

What is the minimum deposit to open a Trading 212 account?+

The published minimum deposit is £1, low enough to open and fund in one step. That entry sits under the €4.64 level seen across the brokers compared here, and under the $5 Vantage asks for, so a small first transfer is enough to get going.

Does Trading 212 charge for keeping an account open or leaving it idle?+

The account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0, so neither holding the account nor letting it sit dormant is billed on the published sheet. The €10 inactivity level across the brokers compared sits well above that floor, which is where dormant-account charges usually show up.

Capital.com

Capital.com

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10See alternatives