Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

NAGA vs Trading 212

NAGA scores 8.7 and Trading 212 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

NAGA

8.7/10

Facts checked September 28, 2026.

Trading 212

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

NAGA vs Trading 212: the differences

NAGA vs Trading 212
Compare
NAGANAGA
ReviewVisitVisit
Trading 212
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit€50£1
Stock trade fee€3£0
MarketsStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs, Futures, CryptoCovers moreStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs
RegulatorsCyprus Securities and Exchange CommissionFinancial Conduct Authority, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)Covers more
Investor protectionEU ICS up to EUR 20,000FSCS up to GBP 85,000
PlatformsiOS, Android, Web, MetaTrader 5Trading 212 App, Web Platform
Account feeNot confirmed£0
Inactivity feeNot confirmed£0
Retail accounts that lose money70.45%Not confirmed
Deposit and withdrawal feesNo withdrawal feeNot confirmed
Account typesNot confirmedISA, SIPP, Joint
Interest on cash2.4%Not confirmed

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Trading 212 scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 8.7.
  • Regulators: only Trading 212 offers Financial Conduct Authority, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC).
  • Trading 212 is licensed in 1 more country.
  • Markets: only NAGA offers Futures, Crypto.
  • Platforms: only NAGA offers iOS, Android, Web.
  • Platforms: only Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App, Web Platform.
  • Features: only NAGA offers Crypto, Copy trading.
  • Features: only Trading 212 offers Fractional shares, Demo account.

Our verdict on each

NAGA

NAGA suits mobile copy traders who want stocks, ETFs, forex, CFDs, futures and crypto alongside social features in the same app. Opening starts at €50, while stock trades carry €3, so active share buyers should weigh costs against broader choice.

Read the full NAGA review

Trading 212

Trading 212 suits UK and European beginners who want flat costs: a stock trade fee of £0, an account fee of £0 and an ISA, SIPP and joint account. Forex and CFDs share the same menu, so the easy entry is the reason to look closer, not to trade heavily.

Read the full Trading 212 review

Score breakdown

NAGA vs Trading 212
AreaNAGATrading 212
Cost8.5Stock trades cost €3; withdrawals show No withdrawal fee.9.3HigherCharges sit at the floor: £0 on a trade, £0 on the account, £0 when idle.
Offer9.1Coverage spans stocks, ETFs and forex via iOS, Android and Web for desktop plus mobile.9.2Higher
Trust8.5Cover sits at EU ICS up to EUR 20,000 under Cyprus oversight.9.5Higher

Which one suits you

Pick NAGA if markets matter most.

Pick Trading 212 if cost, trust, and regulators matter most.

Where they rank in our lists

NAGA vs Trading 212
RankingNAGATrading 212
Stock and ETF brokers4 of 47183 of 471
Forex brokers3 of 14735 of 147
Low-spread forex brokers3 of 14533 of 145
CFD brokers3 of 12227 of 122

Licences and countries

NAGA vs Trading 212
CountryNAGATrading 212
Cyprus
United KingdomNot confirmed

Sources behind this comparison

NAGA

  • naga.com: 5 facts, checked September 28, 2026
  • nagamarkets.zendesk.com: 5 facts, checked September 28, 2026

Trading 212

  • en.wikipedia.org: 13 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • esma.europa.eu: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Every fact side by side

NAGA vs Trading 212
FactNAGATrading 212
FeaturesCrypto, Copy trading, Mobile appFractional shares, Demo account, Mobile app
Pricing modelNot confirmedCommission free
AudienceNot confirmedBeginners
Legal entityNot confirmedTrading 212 Markets Ltd
HeadquartersNot confirmedCyprus
FoundedNot confirmed2006

Where each stands against the rest

NAGA vs Trading 212
FactNAGATrading 212Median
Account feeNot confirmed£0at the median£0
Retail accounts that lose money70.45%below the medianNot confirmed72.05%
Interest on cash2.4%below the medianNot confirmed3%

Median across 47 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

NAGA

Pros

  • Access stocks, ETFs and forex under a single login, covering shares through crypto for varied strategies.
  • Trade via iOS, Android and Web, with MetaTrader 5 plus mobile apps for flexible order management.
  • Withdrawals show No withdrawal fee, helped by No withdrawal fee for cost clarity.

Cons

  • Stock trade fee sits at €3, which can weigh on frequent share buyers versus lower fee rivals.
  • Support runs on help centre only, so help stays inside help centre without live chat or phone.
  • Entry starts at €50, above ActivTrades at $0 for very small starters.

Trading 212

Pros

  • Nothing to pay for holding or for going quiet: the account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0.
  • Trading shares costs £0, the same stock trade fee eToro lists at $0, so the trade price is not the reason to move.
  • The entry of £1 sits under the $5 Vantage asks for, which matters for a first transfer.

Cons

  • The market list pairs shares and ETFs with forex and CFDs in stocks, etfs and forex, so a platform aimed at beginners, beginners, also carries leveraged products.
  • The fee sheet is the easy part: retail accounts lose money at 70.15% across the brokers compared, and a £0 trade cost does not remove that risk.
  • The money side runs through Trading 212 Markets Ltd in Cyprus, registered with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission as MiCA CASP 21380045KC28948FNE32, so a UK saver is dealing with a Cyprus entity alongside the UK one.

Who each suits

NAGA

Who it suits

  • Social traders who follow others and want futures plus crypto alongside shares may prefer NAGA over eToro.
  • Mobile led investors starting at €50 who accept €3 may prefer NAGA over ActivTrades.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Cost sensitive share buyers who want lower ticket fees than €3 may prefer XTB.
  • Traders wanting phone or live chat beyond help centre may prefer ActivTrades.

Trading 212

Who it suits

  • Beginners and small regular investors who want a low bar to entry, since the minimum deposit is £1 and the app and demo account in fractional shares, demo account and mobile app support a cautious start.
  • UK and European savers who care about holding cost, because the account fee of £0 and the inactivity fee of £0 leave the account free to sit and free to open.
  • Savers who want a tax-wrapped and shared holding together, since isa, sipp and joint covers an ISA, a SIPP and a joint account under one provider.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Not for forex and CFD traders who want a deeper market list: Trading 212 stops at stocks, etfs and forex, while eToro and Vantage cover more of the leveraged side.
  • Not for anyone who needs a no-cost opening: CFI takes a minimum deposit of $0 against the £1 asked here.
  • Not for savers who want a bigger spread of wrappers: the account range is listed as isa, sipp and joint, which does not stretch to every tax-sheltered account type.

Country by country

NAGA vs Trading 212
CountryNAGATrading 212
AustriaYesNo
BelgiumYesNo
BulgariaYesNo
CroatiaYesNo
CyprusYesNo
CzechiaYesNo
DenmarkYesNo
EstoniaYesNo

8 of 30 countries where either is available.

Questions about each

NAGA

What does NAGA charge for stock trades and withdrawals?+

Stock orders carry €3 per trade, and funding shows No withdrawal fee for withdrawals. Share buyers who trade often should compare that ticket charge with rivals before committing, as frequent dealing lifts total cost over time.

What is the minimum deposit to open a NAGA account?+

Trading can start at €50, which keeps entry modest for newcomers testing markets. Withdrawals show No withdrawal fee, so moving funds out does not add a separate withdrawal charge under current terms.

Trading 212

What is the minimum deposit to open a Trading 212 account?+

The published minimum deposit is £1, low enough to open and fund in one step. That entry sits under the €4.64 level seen across the brokers compared here, and under the $5 Vantage asks for, so a small first transfer is enough to get going.

Does Trading 212 charge for keeping an account open or leaving it idle?+

The account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0, so neither holding the account nor letting it sit dormant is billed on the published sheet. The €10 inactivity level across the brokers compared sits well above that floor, which is where dormant-account charges usually show up.

Trading 212

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10See alternatives