Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers

Charles Stanley Direct scores 8.9 and Interactive Brokers 9.6 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Charles Stanley Direct

8.9/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Interactive Brokers

9.6/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

What sets them apart

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
Compare
Charles Stanley DirectCharles Stanley Direct
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Interactive BrokersInteractive Brokers
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£1$0
Stock trade fee£10$0
MarketsStocks, ETFs, FundsBonds, ETFs, Forex, Funds, Futures, Options, StocksCovers more
RegulatorsFinancial Conduct AuthoritySEC, FCA, SIPC
Investor protectionFSCS up to GBP 85,000SIPC up to USD 500,000
PlatformsCharles Stanley Direct TradingClient Portal, IBKR Desktop, IBKR Mobile, Trader Workstation
Account typesISA, SIPPISA, SIPP, IRA, Joint, CorporateCovers more
Account fee£60 to £600Not confirmed
Margin rateNot confirmed4.38%
Options contract feeNot confirmed$0.65
Interest on cashNot confirmed3.38%

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Interactive Brokers scores higher overall: 9.6 vs 8.9.
  • Regulators: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Financial Conduct Authority.
  • Regulators: only Interactive Brokers offers SEC, FCA, SIPC.
  • Founded is lower at Charles Stanley Direct: 1792 vs 1978.
  • Interactive Brokers is licensed in 1 more country.
  • Markets: only Interactive Brokers offers Bonds, Forex, Futures.
  • Platforms: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Charles Stanley Direct Trading.
  • Platforms: only Interactive Brokers offers Client Portal, IBKR Desktop, IBKR Mobile.
  • Account types: only Interactive Brokers offers IRA, Joint, Corporate.
  • Support channels: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Email, Phone.

Our verdict on each

Charles Stanley Direct

Charles Stanley Direct suits UK savers who want a pension or ISA wrapper from a long established provider rather than a trading app. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, and a SIPP account fee runs £60 to £600 a year.

Read the full Charles Stanley Direct review

Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers suits investors who want a single account across ISA, SIPP, IRA, joint and corporate holdings, with stocks, bonds, funds, forex, options and futures behind it. It ranks 1 of 213 brands on minimum deposit at $0, and stock trades are charged at $0.

Read the full Interactive Brokers review

Score breakdown

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
AreaCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
Cost8.4Ranks 126 of 138 brands on account fee and 159 of 161 on stock trade fee.9.3HigherStock trades cost $0, the minimum deposit is $0 and an options contract costs $0.65.
Offer8.89.6HigherAccount types cover isa, sipp and ira, and the market list spans bonds, etfs and forex.
Trust9.39.8Higher

How they place

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
RankingCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
Stock and ETF brokers155 of 47144 of 471

Availability and regulation

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
CountryCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
United Kingdom
FCA 208159
United StatesNot confirmed
SIPC SIPC member 53615

Feature by feature

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
MarketsCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
StocksYesYes
ETFsYesYes
ForexNoYes
OptionsNoYes
FuturesNoYes
BondsNoYes
FundsYesYes
Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
Account typesCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
ISAYesYes
SIPPYesYes
IRANoYes
JointNoYes
CorporateNoYes

What we checked

Charles Stanley Direct

  • charles-stanley-direct.co.uk: 5 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • tradingbrokers.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • moneytothemasses.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Interactive Brokers

  • interactivebrokers.com: 9 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • brokersway.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • toponlineforexbrokers.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • euinvestinghub.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
  • eupersonalfinance.eu: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026

Every fact side by side

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
FactCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
FeaturesNot confirmedFractional shares, Mobile app
Pricing modelNot confirmedCommission free, Low fees
Legal entityRaymond James Wealth Management LimitedINTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC
HeadquartersUnited KingdomUnited States
Founded1792Lower1978
Support channelsEmail, PhoneHelp centre, Community

Robo-advisors

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
FactCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
Portfolio typesNot confirmedETF

Where each stands against the rest

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
FactCharles Stanley DirectInteractive BrokersMedian
Account fee£60 to £600highest quarterNot confirmed£0
Margin rateNot confirmed4.38%below the median8.75%
Options contract feeNot confirmed$0.65above the median$0.625
Interest on cashNot confirmed3.38%above the median3%

Median across 43 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Charles Stanley Direct

Pros

  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000.
  • A minimum deposit of £1 keeps the first contribution small, and it ranks 82 of 213 on our minimum deposit data.
  • The group has been running since 1792, so the name sits behind a long investment history.

Cons

  • A SIPP account fee of £60 to £600 a year is the heaviest cost here, and the stock trade fee of £10 is higher than the $0 eToro lists.
  • Support runs on email and phone only, with no live chat listed.
  • The listed account types are isa and sipp, so there is no general investment account or joint option here.

Interactive Brokers

Pros

  • A stock trade costs $0 and the minimum deposit is $0, the pairing behind rank 1 of 161 on stock trade fees among the brokers tracked here.
  • The account types listed cover isa, sipp and ira, so an ISA, SIPP, IRA, joint or corporate account all sit under a single provider.
  • bonds, etfs and forex puts stocks, ETFs, bonds, funds, forex, options and futures on the same account, with a margin rate of 4.38% for geared positions.

Cons

  • Support runs on help centre and community, so a phone line and live chat sit outside the offer.
  • bonds, etfs and forex covers shares, ETFs, bonds, funds, forex, options and futures but leaves out crypto and CFDs, which eToro lists in stocks, etfs and forex.
  • An options contract costs $0.65 against a stock trade at $0, so options strategies pay a visible premium per contract.

Who each suits

Charles Stanley Direct

Who it suits

  • SIPP holders who self-invest in funds and shares and want a familiar name with Financial Conduct Authority oversight.
  • ISA investors who want to top up an existing holding without a large first payment, given the £1 minimum.
  • People who prefer phone and email contact, since support runs on email and phone.

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro, where the stock trade fee is listed as $0, if you trade often rather than hold a pension.
  • CFI, whose minimum deposit is listed as $0 in US dollars, if your budget is set in sterling.
  • Vantage, whose minimum deposit is $5 in US dollars, if you want to start with a larger first payment.

Interactive Brokers

Who it suits

  • Investors holding money across several wrappers, since the account types listed cover isa, sipp and ira.
  • Traders who want options, futures, forex and bonds alongside shares on a single account, per bonds, etfs and forex.
  • Anyone starting with a small balance: the minimum deposit is $0 and fractional shares appear in the feature list (fractional shares and mobile app).

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone who trades crypto or CFDs, since bonds, etfs and forex leaves both out while eToro lists them in stocks, etfs and forex.
  • Readers who want a stated entry figure as a signal of the provider's target size, since Vantage publishes $5 where this broker's minimum is $0.

Country by country

Charles Stanley Direct vs Interactive Brokers
CountryCharles Stanley DirectInteractive Brokers
United KingdomYesNo

Questions about each

Charles Stanley Direct

What does it cost to run a Charles Stanley Direct account?+

A SIPP carries an annual account fee of £60 to £600 and each stock trade costs £10. The account opens from a minimum deposit of £1, so the entry point is small, but the yearly charge is the number that shapes the total cost of holding. Both fees are quoted in pounds.

Is Charles Stanley Direct regulated, and is my money protected?+

The account is run by Raymond James Wealth Management Limited and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under licence 124412. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, which is the scheme limit the provider publishes. That protection sits with the UK regulator, so eligible claims run through the UK compensation system.

Interactive Brokers

What does it cost to trade shares?+

A stock trade is charged at $0 and the minimum deposit is $0, so opening an account and dealing in shares carry no charge. The money sits in derivatives and leverage instead, where an options contract costs $0.65 and the margin rate is listed at 4.38%.

Is my money protected?+

The regulatory list runs to SEC, FCA and SIPC, and investor protection is stated as SIPC up to USD 500,000. The UK entry is the FCA under licence 208159, while the US side names the SEC and the SIPC membership SIPC member 53615. The protection figure describes the scheme stated for the account and says nothing about how a trade performs.

Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

Higher score in this comparison

9.6/10See alternatives