Updated September 28, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX

Charles Stanley Direct scores 8.9 and LYNX 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Charles Stanley Direct

8.9/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

LYNX

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

What sets them apart

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
Compare
Charles Stanley DirectCharles Stanley Direct
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
LYNXLYNX
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£1$0
Stock trade fee£10$5
Account fee£60 to £600€0
MarketsStocks, ETFs, FundsStocks, ETFs, Forex, Options, Futures, Bonds, FundsCovers more
PlatformsCharles Stanley Direct TradingLYNX+, Trader Workstation, Trading App
Inactivity feeNot confirmed€5
RegulatorsFinancial Conduct AuthorityNot confirmed
Investor protectionFSCS up to GBP 85,000Not confirmed
Margin rateNot confirmed7.1%
Deposit and withdrawal feesNot confirmedOne withdrawal per month free
Account typesISA, SIPPNot confirmed

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • LYNX scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 8.9.
  • Markets: only LYNX offers Forex, Options, Futures.
  • Platforms: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Charles Stanley Direct Trading.
  • Platforms: only LYNX offers LYNX+, Trader Workstation, Trading App.

Our verdict on each

Charles Stanley Direct

Charles Stanley Direct suits UK savers who want a pension or ISA wrapper from a long established provider rather than a trading app. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, and a SIPP account fee runs £60 to £600 a year.

Read the full Charles Stanley Direct review

LYNX

LYNX suits experienced traders who want a long list of markets behind the same account. The account fee is €0 and the minimum deposit is $0, so holding costs nothing, while a stock trade fee of $5 makes dealing the cost centre.

Read the full LYNX review

Score breakdown

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
AreaCharles Stanley DirectLYNX
Cost8.4Ranks 126 of 138 brands on account fee and 159 of 161 on stock trade fee.9.0HigherCostly to trade: stock trade fees rank 139 of 161 and the inactivity fee 34 of 56, against an account fee of €0.
Offer8.89.6Higher
Trust9.3Not confirmed

Where each is licensed and available

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
CountryCharles Stanley DirectLYNX
United KingdomNot confirmed

Where these facts come from

Charles Stanley Direct

  • charles-stanley-direct.co.uk: 5 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • tradingbrokers.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • moneytothemasses.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

LYNX

  • brokerchooser.com: 5 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • lynxbroker.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • tradingfinder.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • mygermanfinances.de: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
  • traderfrancophone.fr: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026

How they place

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
RankingCharles Stanley DirectLYNX
Stock and ETF brokers155 of 47174 of 471

Every fact side by side

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
FactCharles Stanley DirectLYNX
FeaturesNot confirmedFractional shares, Demo account, Mobile app
Pricing modelNot confirmedLow fees
AudienceNot confirmedExperienced
Legal entityRaymond James Wealth Management LimitedNot confirmed
HeadquartersUnited KingdomNot confirmed
Founded1792Not confirmed
Support channelsEmail, PhoneNot confirmed

Where each stands against the rest

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
FactCharles Stanley DirectLYNXMedian
Inactivity feeNot confirmed€5above the median€2.45
Margin rateNot confirmed7.1%below the median8.75%

Median across 23 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Charles Stanley Direct

Pros

  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000.
  • A minimum deposit of £1 keeps the first contribution small, and it ranks 82 of 213 on our minimum deposit data.
  • The group has been running since 1792, so the name sits behind a long investment history.

Cons

  • A SIPP account fee of £60 to £600 a year is the heaviest cost here, and the stock trade fee of £10 is higher than the $0 eToro lists.
  • Support runs on email and phone only, with no live chat listed.
  • The listed account types are isa and sipp, so there is no general investment account or joint option here.

LYNX

Pros

  • Nothing to pay for the account itself: fees run €0 and the minimum deposit is $0.
  • The same account covers stocks, etfs and forex, putting shares, funds, bonds and derivatives under one roof.
  • Platform choice runs from the LYNX+ terminal to the Trader Workstation and a mobile app, and a demo account with fractional shares comes with it.

Cons

  • A stock trade fee of $5 applies to every deal, so frequent dealing raises the bill quickly.
  • An inactivity fee of €5 applies, so money left untouched still carries a charge.
  • A margin rate of 7.1% means a small deposit can control a much larger position.

Who each suits

Charles Stanley Direct

Who it suits

  • SIPP holders who self-invest in funds and shares and want a familiar name with Financial Conduct Authority oversight.
  • ISA investors who want to top up an existing holding without a large first payment, given the £1 minimum.
  • People who prefer phone and email contact, since support runs on email and phone.

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro, where the stock trade fee is listed as $0, if you trade often rather than hold a pension.
  • CFI, whose minimum deposit is listed as $0 in US dollars, if your budget is set in sterling.
  • Vantage, whose minimum deposit is $5 in US dollars, if you want to start with a larger first payment.

LYNX

Who it suits

  • Experienced traders: the audience listed is experienced, and the account is priced as a low fee model.
  • Anyone who wants stocks, etfs and forex sitting in the same login.
  • Traders who want to practise first, with a demo account and fractional shares alongside a mobile app.

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro for occasional share buying: its stock trade fee is $0 against $5 at LYNX, so small repeated deals cost more here.
  • Vantage for anyone who must start with a deposit: the minimum deposit there is $5 while LYNX opens at $0.
  • CFI for CFD and crypto trading, since its markets run to stocks, etfs and forex while LYNX runs to stocks, etfs and forex.

Country by country

Charles Stanley Direct vs LYNX
CountryCharles Stanley DirectLYNX
United KingdomYesNo

Questions about each

Charles Stanley Direct

What does it cost to run a Charles Stanley Direct account?+

A SIPP carries an annual account fee of £60 to £600 and each stock trade costs £10. The account opens from a minimum deposit of £1, so the entry point is small, but the yearly charge is the number that shapes the total cost of holding. Both fees are quoted in pounds.

Is Charles Stanley Direct regulated, and is my money protected?+

The account is run by Raymond James Wealth Management Limited and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under licence 124412. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, which is the scheme limit the provider publishes. That protection sits with the UK regulator, so eligible claims run through the UK compensation system.

LYNX

What does LYNX charge to open and hold an account?+

Opening and holding are free: the account fee is €0 and the minimum deposit is $0. Costs appear only when you trade, through a stock trade fee of $5. The account is priced overall as a low fee model rather than a subscription service.

What does a stock trade cost on LYNX?+

A stock trade costs $5 with no account fee on top, and the same account also carries forex, options, futures, bonds and funds. On share dealing alone LYNX sits near the back of the brands compared, at 139 of 161.

LYNX

LYNX

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10See alternatives