Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets

Charles Stanley Direct scores 8.9 and FP Markets 9.0 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Charles Stanley Direct

8.9/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

FP Markets

9.0/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

What sets them apart

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
Compare
Charles Stanley DirectCharles Stanley Direct
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
FP MarketsFP Markets
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£1A$100
MarketsStocks, ETFs, FundsForex, CFDs
RegulatorsFinancial Conduct AuthorityASIC, SIPC
Investor protectionFSCS up to GBP 85,000SIPC up to USD 500,000
Stock trade fee£10Not confirmed
Account fee£60 to £600Not confirmed
Retail accounts that lose moneyNot confirmed72.5%
PlatformsCharles Stanley Direct TradingNot confirmed
Account typesISA, SIPPNot confirmed

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • FP Markets scores higher overall: 9.0 vs 8.9.
  • Regulators: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Financial Conduct Authority.
  • Regulators: only FP Markets offers ASIC, SIPC.
  • FP Markets is licensed in 1 more country.
  • Markets: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Stocks, ETFs, Funds.
  • Markets: only FP Markets offers Forex, CFDs.

Our verdict on each

Charles Stanley Direct

Charles Stanley Direct suits UK savers who want a pension or ISA wrapper from a long established provider rather than a trading app. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, and a SIPP account fee runs £60 to £600 a year.

Read the full Charles Stanley Direct review

FP Markets

FP Markets suits traders who want a regulated broker with a real protection scheme behind the money, not the lowest entry cost. It is regulated in Australia and the US, and the US entity carries SIPC cover of SIPC up to USD 500,000. The catch is the entry hurdle: a minimum deposit of AUD 100.

Read the full FP Markets review

Score breakdown

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
AreaCharles Stanley DirectFP Markets
Cost8.4Ranks 126 of 138 brands on account fee and 159 of 161 on stock trade fee.8.6Higher
Offer8.8Higher8.6
Trust9.39.5Higher

What each covers

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
MarketsCharles Stanley DirectFP Markets
StocksYesNo
ETFsYesNo
ForexNoYes
CFDsNoYes
FundsYesNo

Licences and countries

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
CountryCharles Stanley DirectFP Markets
AustraliaNot confirmed
United KingdomNot confirmed
United StatesNot confirmed
SIPC SIPC member 71021

Sources behind this comparison

Charles Stanley Direct

  • charles-stanley-direct.co.uk: 5 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • tradingbrokers.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • moneytothemasses.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

FP Markets

  • brokerchooser.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • sipc.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • fxscouts.ng: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
  • leadiq.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026

Every fact side by side

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
FactCharles Stanley DirectFP Markets
Legal entityRaymond James Wealth Management LimitedRB INTERNATIONAL MARKETS (USA) LLC
HeadquartersUnited KingdomNot confirmed
Founded1792Not confirmed
Support channelsEmail, PhoneNot confirmed

Where each stands against the rest

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
FactCharles Stanley DirectFP MarketsMedian
Stock trade fee£10highest quarterNot confirmed£0
Account fee£60 to £600highest quarterNot confirmed£0
Retail accounts that lose moneyNot confirmed72.5%above the median72.05%

Median across 47 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Charles Stanley Direct

Pros

  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000.
  • A minimum deposit of £1 keeps the first contribution small, and it ranks 82 of 213 on our minimum deposit data.
  • The group has been running since 1792, so the name sits behind a long investment history.

Cons

  • A SIPP account fee of £60 to £600 a year is the heaviest cost here, and the stock trade fee of £10 is higher than the $0 eToro lists.
  • Support runs on email and phone only, with no live chat listed.
  • The listed account types are isa and sipp, so there is no general investment account or joint option here.

FP Markets

Pros

  • Regulated in Australia and the US, with the US entity covered by SIPC up to USD 500,000.
  • A single, named legal entity, RB INTERNATIONAL MARKETS (USA) LLC, holds the SIPC membership, licence SIPC member 71021.
  • A focused product: forex and cfds, without a wider asset mix to learn.

Cons

  • The minimum deposit of AUD 100 is well above the site median of €4.64.
  • A limited market list, forex and cfds, so it does not cover shares, ETFs or crypto.
  • The cost score is 3.1, one of the weaker parts of the profile.

Who each suits

Charles Stanley Direct

Who it suits

  • SIPP holders who self-invest in funds and shares and want a familiar name with Financial Conduct Authority oversight.
  • ISA investors who want to top up an existing holding without a large first payment, given the £1 minimum.
  • People who prefer phone and email contact, since support runs on email and phone.

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro, where the stock trade fee is listed as $0, if you trade often rather than hold a pension.
  • CFI, whose minimum deposit is listed as $0 in US dollars, if your budget is set in sterling.
  • Vantage, whose minimum deposit is $5 in US dollars, if you want to start with a larger first payment.

FP Markets

Who it suits

  • Traders who weight regulator and protection scheme above a low starting amount
  • Anyone happy to trade a single market pair of products, forex and cfds
  • US clients who want the SIPC scheme, SIPC up to USD 500,000, behind the account

Who should look elsewhere

  • Small starters, who will find AUD 100 a high way in
  • Investors wanting shares, ETFs or crypto, since forex and cfds covers neither
  • eToro users who want a much wider asset list, stocks, etfs and forex

Country by country

Charles Stanley Direct vs FP Markets
CountryCharles Stanley DirectFP Markets
United KingdomYesNo

Questions about each

Charles Stanley Direct

What does it cost to run a Charles Stanley Direct account?+

A SIPP carries an annual account fee of £60 to £600 and each stock trade costs £10. The account opens from a minimum deposit of £1, so the entry point is small, but the yearly charge is the number that shapes the total cost of holding. Both fees are quoted in pounds.

Is Charles Stanley Direct regulated, and is my money protected?+

The account is run by Raymond James Wealth Management Limited and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under licence 124412. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, which is the scheme limit the provider publishes. That protection sits with the UK regulator, so eligible claims run through the UK compensation system.

FP Markets

What is the minimum deposit at FP Markets?+

The minimum deposit is AUD 100. That is a high way in, and it sits well above the site median of €4.64. Anyone starting with a small amount should look at a broker with a lower entry figure before committing.

Is my money protected at FP Markets?+

The US-facing entity, RB INTERNATIONAL MARKETS (USA) LLC, is covered by SIPC up to USD 500,000. That protection belongs to the US entity, so clients of other entities in the group should check which scheme applies to them before depositing.

FP Markets

FP Markets

Higher score in this comparison

9.0/10See alternatives