Updated September 28, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team
Earn2Trade vs Ftmo
What sets them apart
| Compare |  Earn2Trade |  Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 50% to 80% | 80% to 90%Higher |
| Maximum drawdown | 3.5% to 6% | 10%Higher |
| Evaluation steps | 1 step | 2 step |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K, $400K | $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 |
| Daily loss limit | 2.2% | 3% to 5% |
| Payout frequency | Weekly payouts from $100 | Reward claim from the 14th day after first trade; paid within 1-2 business days after invoice approval |
| Challenge price | $75 to $85 | Not confirmed |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Ftmo scores higher overall: 9.6 vs 9.1.
- Founded is lower at Ftmo: 2015 vs 2017.
- Profit split is higher at Ftmo: 80% to 90% vs 50% to 80%.
- Maximum drawdown is higher at Ftmo: 10% vs 3.5% to 6%.
- Support channels: only Ftmo offers Chat, Phone.
Our verdict on each
Earn2Trade
Earn2Trade is a futures prop firm aimed at experienced traders, with a 1 step evaluation and challenge fees of $75 to $85 on account sizes of $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K, $400K. Weekly payouts and platforms such as Tradovate, NinjaTrader and TradingView suit traders already working in futures.
Ftmo
FTMO pairs a 2 step evaluation with a fixed maximum drawdown of 10% and a profit split of 80% to 90%, below the 100% offered by Funding Pips. It suits disciplined traders who want clear published rules, a choice of account sizes and broad support coverage.
Score breakdown
| Area | Earn2Trade | Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 9.1Challenge fees of $75 to $85 sit above the site median of €56.56. | Not confirmed |
| Offer | 8.3 | 9.4HigherFixed terms on offer: 10% maximum drawdown, 3% to 5% daily loss limit, 2 step evaluation, 80% to 90% profit split. |
| Trust | 9.6 | 9.7Higher |
Ranges side by side
| Fact | Earn2Trade | Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 50% to 80% | 80% to 90% |
| Daily loss limit | 2.2% | 3% to 5% |
Positions in our rankings
| Ranking | Earn2Trade | Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Prop trading firms | 14 of 37 | 5 of 37 |
A third option
Funding Pips has maximum drawdown at 12%, against 3.5% to 6% for Earn2Trade and 10% for Ftmo.
Funding Pips reviewWhat we checked
Earn2Trade
- earn2trade.com: 11 facts, checked September 26, 2026
Ftmo
- ftmo.com: 10 facts, checked September 26, 2026
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Earn2Trade | Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Earn2Trade LLC | FTMO s.r.o. |
| Headquarters | United States | Czechia |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015Lower |
| Support channels | Email, Help centre, Community | Email, Chat, Phone, Help centre, CommunityCovers more |
Brokers
| Fact | Earn2Trade | Ftmo |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum deposit | $75 | Not confirmed |
| Account fee | $0 | Not confirmed |
| Markets | Futures | Not confirmed |
| Features | Futures | Not confirmed |
| Audience | Experienced | Not confirmed |
| Deposit and withdrawal fees | No upfront activation fee; one-time activation fee deducted from profits on first withdrawal | Not confirmed |
| Platforms | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Finamark, BlackArrow, Rithmic | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | Earn2Trade | Ftmo | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge price | $75 to $85at the median | Not confirmed | $75 |
| Profit split | 50% to 80%lowest quarter | 80% to 90%at the median | 90 |
| Maximum drawdown | 3.5% to 6%below the median | 10%at the median | 10 |
| Daily loss limit | 2.2%lowest quarter | 3% to 5%at the median | 3 |
Median across 26 listed brokers.
Pros and cons
Earn2Trade
Pros
- A 1 step evaluation shortens the route to a funded account.
- Payouts are made weekly once the minimum payout amount is met, alongside a profit split of 50% to 80%.
- No upfront activation fee, with that fee instead deducted from profits on the first withdrawal.
Cons
- Challenge fees of $75 to $85 sit above the site median of €56.56.
- A profit split of 50% to 80% is below the site median of 90%.
- Support runs on email, help centre and community, so phone and chat are not part of the offering.
Ftmo
Pros
- Trading limits are published in plain form: a 10% maximum drawdown and a 3% to 5% daily loss limit, both easy to check against your own risk plan.
- The drawdown limit stays at 10% across the evaluation, while Alpha Capital Group works with limits of 4% to 10%.
- Account sizes of $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 let a trader scale the account to the capital they actually have.
Cons
- The profit split of 80% to 90% leaves a share of each payout with the firm, where Funding Pips and Apex Trader Funding list 100% and 100%.
- The daily loss limit of 3% to 5% and the 10% maximum drawdown are both hard, so a weak session can end an evaluation on a larger size than planned.
- A reward claim only opens after a waiting period counted from the first trade, and payment waits on invoice approval, so the first payout takes patience.
Who each suits
Earn2Trade
Who it suits
- Experienced futures traders who keep well inside a daily loss limit of 2.2%.
- Traders comfortable working to a maximum drawdown of 3.5% to 6% on a funded account.
- Futures traders on Tradovate, NinjaTrader or TradingView who want a profit split of 50% to 80%.
Who should look elsewhere
- Traders chasing a bigger share of profits, since Apex Trader Funding lists a profit split of 100%.
- Buyers on a tight budget, as Alpha Capital Group charges a challenge fee of $27.
- Traders who want a spread of challenge prices, since Funding Pips fees run $29 to $555.
Ftmo
Who it suits
- Traders who want the loss limits on the table before they pay: 3% to 5% a day and 10% overall.
- Traders who want to reach support by email, chat and phone, including phone and chat.
- Anyone whose capital fits one of the listed sizes, $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000, and who can sit out the claim window after the first trade.
Who should look elsewhere
- Traders who want to keep every point of profit: Funding Pips and Apex Trader Funding publish 100% and 100% splits, against 80% to 90% here.
- Traders who want a tighter loss cap: Alpha Capital Group works with a maximum drawdown of 4% to 10%, which suits people who want a lower ceiling than 10%.
Current offers
Earn2Trade
Current offer
Discount code
Labor Day Special: 50% OFF + a FREE Reset With Every Evaluation: 50% off plus a free reset with every evaluation
Use code 50PLUSRESET at purchase
Source, checked September 26, 2026
Ftmo
Current offer
Discount code
20% Off Special deal on $100K 1-Step Challenge: 20% off
Offer banner on the official site linking to the 1-Step purchase flow; one-time percentage discount on the $100,000 1-Step Challenge.
Source, checked September 26, 2026
Free trial
FTMO Free Trial: Free
Free, simplified version of the FTMO Challenge for practice purposes, signup at trader.ftmo.com/free-trial, no limit on repeats.
Source, checked September 26, 2026
Questions about each
Earn2Trade
How much does an Earn2Trade challenge cost?+
Challenge fees are $75 to $85, with a starting payment of $75. There is no monthly subscription attached, since the account fee is $0. The price covers the evaluation itself, and any activation fee is handled separately at the first withdrawal.
Are there activation fees on top of the challenge price?+
There is no upfront activation fee. Instead, an activation fee is taken out of profits on the first withdrawal, so the first payout is smaller while the cost of entry stays at the challenge price.
Ftmo
What does an FTMO challenge cost?+
FTMO lists the account sizes you can enter, $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000, and the evaluation runs as a 2 step process, so the entry cost follows the size and the stage you buy. For a sense of the market, the median challenge price across the sites compared here is €56.56, and the median for prop firms is €51.74.
How many stages does the evaluation have?+
FTMO runs a 2 step evaluation, so passing takes more than a single stage and a strong result in a single stage does not carry the account through. That structure appears on 40.9% of the sites compared here, against 36.4% for the single-stage model. Each stage is judged against the same 10% maximum drawdown and 3% to 5% daily loss limit.