Updated September 28, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum

Charles Stanley Direct scores 8.9 and Plum 8.9 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Charles Stanley Direct

8.9/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Plum

8.9/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum: the differences

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
Compare
Charles Stanley DirectCharles Stanley Direct
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
PlumPlum
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£1Lower£2
Stock trade fee£10£0Lower
Account fee£60 to £600£0Lower
PlatformsCharles Stanley Direct TradingMobile app
Account typesISA, SIPPISA, SIPP, LisaCovers more

Same on both: Markets (Stocks, ETFs, Funds), Regulators (Financial Conduct Authority), Investor protection (FSCS up to GBP 85,000).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Founded is lower at Charles Stanley Direct: 1792 vs 2016.
  • Minimum deposit is lower at Charles Stanley Direct: £1 vs £2.
  • Stock trade fee is lower at Plum: £0 vs £10.
  • Account fee is lower at Plum: £0 vs £60 to £600.
  • Platforms: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Charles Stanley Direct Trading.
  • Platforms: only Plum offers Mobile app.
  • Account types: only Plum offers Lisa.
  • Support channels: only Charles Stanley Direct offers Phone.
  • Support channels: only Plum offers Help centre.

Our verdict on each

Charles Stanley Direct

Charles Stanley Direct suits UK savers who want a pension or ISA wrapper from a long established provider rather than a trading app. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, and a SIPP account fee runs £60 to £600 a year.

Read the full Charles Stanley Direct review

Plum

Plum is a UK app aimed at beginners who want to start small and pay nothing to hold or trade. Stocks, ETFs and funds sit behind fractional shares, the account fee is £0 and the minimum deposit is £2, so small amounts can be put to work in a SIPP, ISA or LISA.

Read the full Plum review

Score breakdown

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
AreaCharles Stanley DirectPlum
Cost8.4Ranks 126 of 138 brands on account fee and 159 of 161 on stock trade fee.9.3HigherStock dealing is £0, the account fee is £0 and management fees run 0.15% to 0.6% on portfolios.
Offer8.88.9Higher
Trust9.3Higher8.5

Where each is licensed and available

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
CountryCharles Stanley DirectPlum
United KingdomNot confirmed

Pick Charles Stanley Direct if, pick Plum if

Pick Charles Stanley Direct if trust and minimum deposit matter most.

Pick Plum if cost, stock trade fee, account fee, and account types matter most.

Positions in our rankings

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
RankingCharles Stanley DirectPlum
Stock and ETF brokers147 of 490160 of 490
Investment platforms and apps32 of 8533 of 85
Stocks and shares ISA providers6 of 217 of 21
SIPP providers5 of 226 of 22

Where these facts come from

Charles Stanley Direct

  • charles-stanley-direct.co.uk: 5 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • tradingbrokers.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • moneytothemasses.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Plum

  • withplum.com: 10 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • finextra.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Every fact side by side

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
FactCharles Stanley DirectPlum
FeaturesNot confirmedFractional shares, Mobile app
Pricing modelNot confirmedCommission free
AudienceNot confirmedBeginners
Legal entityRaymond James Wealth Management LimitedPlum Fintech Limited
HeadquartersUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
Founded1792Lower2016
Support channelsEmail, PhoneEmail, Help centre

Robo-advisors

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
FactCharles Stanley DirectPlum
Management feeNot confirmed0.15% to 0.6%
Minimum investmentNot confirmed£1
Portfolio typesNot confirmedETF, Cash

Where each stands against the rest

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
FactCharles Stanley DirectPlumMedian
Minimum deposit£1lowest quarter£2below the median£25
Stock trade fee£10highest quarter£0at the median£0
Account fee£60 to £600highest quarter£0at the median£0

Median across 16 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Charles Stanley Direct

Pros

  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000.
  • A minimum deposit of £1 keeps the first contribution small, and it ranks 82 of 213 on our minimum deposit data.
  • The group has been running since 1792, so the name sits behind a long investment history.

Cons

  • A SIPP account fee of £60 to £600 a year is the heaviest cost here, and the stock trade fee of £10 is higher than the $0 eToro lists.
  • Support runs on email and phone only, with no live chat listed.
  • The listed account types are isa and sipp, so there is no general investment account or joint option here.

Plum

Pros

  • Stock trades cost £0 and the account fee is £0, so holding and dealing carry no charge.
  • The account opens from £2 and the smallest investment is £1, which suits small regular amounts.
  • Fractional shares on a Mobile app let a small sum hold part of a share rather than a whole one.

Cons

  • Support runs on email and help centre only, so an urgent question waits for a written answer.
  • The market list is stocks, etfs and funds and portfolio types run to etf and cash, so the account is narrow beside a full trading platform.
  • The minimum deposit of £2 ranks 89 of 213, and CFI lists a minimum deposit of $0.

Who each suits

Charles Stanley Direct

Who it suits

  • SIPP holders who self-invest in funds and shares and want a familiar name with Financial Conduct Authority oversight.
  • ISA investors who want to top up an existing holding without a large first payment, given the £1 minimum.
  • People who prefer phone and email contact, since support runs on email and phone.

Who should look elsewhere

  • eToro, where the stock trade fee is listed as $0, if you trade often rather than hold a pension.
  • CFI, whose minimum deposit is listed as $0 in US dollars, if your budget is set in sterling.
  • Vantage, whose minimum deposit is $5 in US dollars, if you want to start with a larger first payment.

Plum

Who it suits

  • Beginners who want a SIPP, ISA or LISA going from a first deposit of £2.
  • Investors who want to pick their own shares and are content with portfolio types of etf and cash.
  • Readers who care most about the cost of a trade, since dealing is £0 and the account fee is £0.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone wanting a lower floor than the £2 minimum, since CFI lists a minimum deposit of $0.
  • Readers comparing purely on dealing costs, since eToro also charges $0 for a stock trade.
  • People who want to fund from a higher starting amount: Vantage lists a minimum deposit of $5.

Country by country

Charles Stanley Direct vs Plum
CountryCharles Stanley DirectPlum
United KingdomYesNo

Questions about each

Charles Stanley Direct

What does it cost to run a Charles Stanley Direct account?+

A SIPP carries an annual account fee of £60 to £600 and each stock trade costs £10. The account opens from a minimum deposit of £1, so the entry point is small, but the yearly charge is the number that shapes the total cost of holding. Both fees are quoted in pounds.

Is Charles Stanley Direct regulated, and is my money protected?+

The account is run by Raymond James Wealth Management Limited and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under licence 124412. Investor protection is stated as FSCS up to GBP 85,000, which is the scheme limit the provider publishes. That protection sits with the UK regulator, so eligible claims run through the UK compensation system.

Plum

How much does it cost to use Plum?+

Stock trades cost £0 and the account fee is £0, so there is no dealing charge and no annual subscription to pay. The cost that can appear is the management fee of 0.15% to 0.6% on portfolios, which applies to the managed side rather than to every account. On the cost of holding and dealing, Plum sits at the cheap end of the field.

Is Plum regulated, and is my money protected?+

Plum is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and the account is held with Plum Fintech Limited. The stated investor protection is FSCS up to GBP 85,000, which is the compensation available if the firm cannot pay a valid claim. That is the standard UK arrangement for a firm holding investments, and it is the part to check before depositing.

Charles Stanley Direct

Charles Stanley Direct

Higher score in this comparison

8.9/10See alternatives