Updated September 30, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool

Simply Wall St scores 8.7 and The Motley Fool 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Simply Wall St

8.7/10

Facts checked September 28, 2026.

The Motley Fool

9.3/10

Facts checked September 30, 2026.

What sets them apart

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool
Compare
Simply Wall StSimply Wall St
ReviewVisitVisit
The Motley Fool
ReviewVisitVisit
Tool typeScreener, Research, Portfolio trackerCovers moreResearch, Portfolio tracker
MarketsStocksStocks, ETFsCovers more
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Mobile
Money-back period14 days30 daysHigher
Free trial length7 daysNot confirmed

Same on both: Free plan (Yes).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • The Motley Fool scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 8.7.
  • Money-back period is higher at The Motley Fool: 30 days vs 14 days.
  • Founded is lower at The Motley Fool: 1993 vs 2014.
  • Markets: only The Motley Fool offers ETFs.
  • Platforms: only Simply Wall St offers iOS, Android.
  • Platforms: only The Motley Fool offers Mobile.
  • Support channels: only The Motley Fool offers Phone.
  • Tool type: only Simply Wall St offers Screener.
  • Pricing model: only Simply Wall St offers Free trial.

Our verdict on each

Simply Wall St

Simply Wall St suits investors who want visual stock research plus a portfolio tracker across web and mobile, with support through email and help centre. You can start on the free plan and explore paid features during the trial lasting 7, backed by cover lasting 14.

Read the full Simply Wall St review

The Motley Fool

The Motley Fool suits beginners who want ideas on stocks and ETFs plus tools for research and portfolio tracker you can use on web and mobile, with help through email, phone and help centre and a free plan to start.

Read the full The Motley Fool review

Score breakdown

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool
AreaSimply Wall StThe Motley Fool
Cost8.7Cost reflects trial access lasting 7 plus cover lasting 14.9.3HigherFree plan model free plan with refund cover of 30 days supports cost confidence.
Offer8.9Offer reflects screener and research depth shown in screener, research and portfolio tracker for stocks.9.2HigherResearch focus across stocks and ETFs with tools for research and portfolio tracker shapes the offer.
Trust8.5Trust reflects clear corporate identity in Simply Wall Street Pty Ltd based in AU.9.4HigherLong standing base in US since 1993 supports trust.

How they place

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool
RankingSimply Wall StThe Motley Fool
Investing research tools2 of 345 of 34

Pick Simply Wall St if, pick The Motley Fool if

Pick Simply Wall St if tool type matter most.

Pick The Motley Fool if cost, offer, trust, markets, and money-back period matter most.

A third option

WealthFluent has money-back period at 60 days, against 14 days for Simply Wall St and 30 days for The Motley Fool.

WealthFluent review

What we checked

Simply Wall St

  • simplywall.st: 10 facts, checked September 28, 2026
  • support.simplywall.st: 1 fact, checked September 28, 2026

The Motley Fool

  • fool.com: 7 facts, checked September 30, 2026
  • support.fool.com: 3 facts, checked September 30, 2026

Every fact side by side

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool
FactSimply Wall StThe Motley Fool
Pricing modelFree plan, Free trialCovers moreFree plan
Legal entitySimply Wall Street Pty LtdThe Motley Fool, LLC
HeadquartersAustraliaUnited States
Founded20141993Lower
Support channelsEmail, Help centreEmail, Phone, Help centreCovers more

Where each stands against the rest

Simply Wall St vs The Motley Fool
FactSimply Wall StThe Motley FoolMedian
Free trial length7 dayslowest quarterNot confirmed14 days
Money-back period14 dayslowest quarter30 daysat the median30 days

Median across 9 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Simply Wall St

Pros

  • Keeps a free plan with trial access under free plan and free trial, useful for testing stock screens before paying.
  • Covers screener, research and portfolio tracker for stocks, linking ideas, research notes and tracking in a single view.
  • Works across web, iOS and Android, so research started on web stays visible on mobile.

Cons

  • Coverage stays limited to stocks, so ETF or fund holders may need LemurTrade for stocks, ETFs and crypto.
  • Support runs on email and help centre only, which may feel slow if you prefer live chat or calls.
  • Trial access lasts 7, so evaluation time is short compared with tools that allow longer review.

The Motley Fool

Pros

  • Covers stocks and ETFs, keeping equity research focused for share and ETF investors.
  • Provides research and portfolio tracker to link ideas with ongoing holding reviews.
  • Available on web and mobile for use at home and while away.

Cons

  • Coverage stays within stocks and ETFs, while GeVestor spans stocks, ETFs and forex for wider asset choice.
  • Tools centre on research and portfolio tracker, while LemurTrade adds scope through stocks, ETFs and crypto for varied interests.
  • Support runs on email, phone and help centre only, without chat for quick queries during market hours.

Who each suits

Simply Wall St

Who it suits

  • Choose Simply Wall St over WealthFluent if you want a free plan with trial access under free plan and free trial.
  • Choose Simply Wall St over LemurTrade if you prefer focused equity depth in stocks rather than broad screening across stocks, ETFs and crypto.
  • Choose Simply Wall St over GeVestor if you want screener led stock views rather than coverage across stocks, ETFs and forex.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Choose GeVestor over Simply Wall St if you want broader multi asset coverage across stocks, ETFs and forex rather than stocks.
  • Choose LemurTrade over Simply Wall St if you want ETF and fund screening within stocks, ETFs and crypto.

The Motley Fool

Who it suits

  • You want stocks and ETFs ideas with research and portfolio tracker, rather than the narrower stocks focus of The Oxford Club.
  • You prefer a guided research style on web and mobile, rather than the broader stocks, ETFs and forex mix at GeVestor.
  • You value help through email, phone and help centre, compared with more limited contact routes elsewhere.

Who should look elsewhere

  • You may prefer GeVestor over The Motley Fool if you want stocks, ETFs and forex rather than stocks and ETFs for multi asset ideas.
  • You may prefer LemurTrade over The Motley Fool if you want crypto and fund coverage within stocks, ETFs and crypto.

Questions about each

Simply Wall St

Does Simply Wall St offer a free plan?+

Yes, Simply Wall St maintains a free plan aimed at stock research for everyday investors. The paid structure sits under free plan and free trial, so you can stay on the free tier or move up after review. The trial lasting 7 gives added room to compare limits before you decide.

How long is the free trial?+

The standard trial lasts 7, giving you short term access to paid research screens and portfolio views. Use that window to check watchlists, company pages and alerts. If the style does not suit your routine, you can return to the free plan without added steps.

The Motley Fool

Which markets does The Motley Fool cover?+

You can follow ideas across stocks and ETFs, which keeps the focus on listed equity and diversified equity baskets. That scope suits you if you prefer shares and ETFs rather than currency or derivatives. Broader asset coverage is available through GeVestor, which spans stocks, ETFs and forex.

What type of investing tool is it?+

You get tools for research and portfolio tracker, which combine written research with a way to monitor holdings in a structured view. That pairing helps you link ideas to your existing positions. If you want screening or charting as a core activity, consider how that mix fits your routine.

The Motley Fool

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10Visit