Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Nutmeg vs Trading 212

Nutmeg scores 9.2 and Trading 212 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Nutmeg

9.2/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Trading 212

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

What sets them apart

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
Compare
NutmegNutmeg
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Trading 212
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Minimum deposit£500£1Lower
MarketsETFs, Funds, Stocks, BondsStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs
RegulatorsFinancial Conduct AuthorityFinancial Conduct Authority, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)Covers more
PlatformsWeb, Mobile appTrading 212 App, Web Platform
Account typesISA, SIPPISA, SIPP, JointCovers more
Account feeNot confirmed£0
Inactivity feeNot confirmed£0
Deposit and withdrawal feesno set-up, trading or exit feesNot confirmed

Same on both: Stock trade fee (£0), Investor protection (FSCS up to GBP 85,000).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Trading 212 scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 9.2.
  • Regulators: only Trading 212 offers Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC).
  • Founded is lower at Trading 212: 2006 vs 2012.
  • Trading 212 is licensed in 1 more country.
  • Minimum deposit is lower at Trading 212: £1 vs £500.
  • Markets: only Nutmeg offers Funds, Bonds.
  • Markets: only Trading 212 offers Forex, CFDs.
  • Platforms: only Nutmeg offers Web, Mobile app.
  • Platforms: only Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App, Web Platform.
  • Account types: only Trading 212 offers Joint.

Our verdict on each

Nutmeg

Nutmeg suits UK investors who want a managed portfolio held in an ISA or SIPP rather than a self-directed dealing account. The cost of that convenience is a single management fee of 0.25% to 0.75%, with a £0 stock trade fee and FSCS protection of FSCS up to GBP 85,000 in place.

Read the full Nutmeg review

Trading 212

Trading 212 suits UK and European beginners who want flat costs: a stock trade fee of £0, an account fee of £0 and an ISA, SIPP and joint account. Forex and CFDs share the same menu, so the easy entry is the reason to look closer, not to trade heavily.

Read the full Trading 212 review

Score breakdown

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
AreaNutmegTrading 212
Cost9.0Management fees of 0.25% to 0.75% run above the robo-adviser median of 0.35%, and the entry floor is high.9.3HigherCharges sit at the floor: £0 on a trade, £0 on the account, £0 when idle.
Offer9.6Higher9.2
Trust9.19.5Higher

Where they rank in our lists

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
RankingNutmegTrading 212
Stock and ETF brokers92 of 49074 of 490
Investment platforms and apps20 of 8518 of 85
Stocks and shares ISA providers3 of 212 of 21
SIPP providers3 of 222 of 22

Licences and countries

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
CountryNutmegTrading 212
United Kingdom
CyprusNot confirmed

Also worth a look

Spreadex has minimum deposit at £0, against £500 for Nutmeg and £1 for Trading 212.

Spreadex review

Every fact side by side

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
FactNutmegTrading 212
FeaturesMobile appFractional shares, Demo account, Mobile appCovers more
Pricing modelCommission freeCommission free
AudienceNot confirmedBeginners
Legal entityJ.P. Morgan Personal Investing LimitedTrading 212 Markets Ltd
HeadquartersUnited KingdomCyprus
Founded20122006Lower
Support channelsEmail, Chat, Phone, Help centreNot confirmed

Where each stands against the rest

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
FactNutmegTrading 212Median
Minimum deposit£500highest quarter£1lowest quarter£25
Stock trade fee£0at the median£0at the median£0
Account feeNot confirmed£0at the median£0

Median across 16 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Nutmeg

Pros

  • One ongoing charge to read: management fees of 0.25% to 0.75%, with no set-up, trading or exit fees on top.
  • Holdings span etfs, funds and stocks, so a managed basket can still cover a wide spread of asset types.
  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, with FSCS protection of FSCS up to GBP 85,000 behind the account.

Cons

  • Management fees of 0.25% to 0.75% sit above the robo-adviser median of 0.35%, and the cost rises as the balance grows.
  • The opening deposit is £500 and later money goes in from £100 to £500, higher than the robo-adviser median of €60.06.
  • The portfolio range is etf, esg and cash only, so there is no crypto or thematic option to tilt towards.

Trading 212

Pros

  • Nothing to pay for holding or for going quiet: the account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0.
  • Trading shares costs £0, the same stock trade fee eToro lists at $0, so the trade price is not the reason to move.
  • The entry of £1 sits under the $5 Vantage asks for, which matters for a first transfer.

Cons

  • The market list pairs shares and ETFs with forex and CFDs in stocks, etfs and forex, so a platform aimed at beginners, beginners, also carries leveraged products.
  • The fee sheet is the easy part: retail accounts lose money at 70.15% across the brokers compared, and a £0 trade cost does not remove that risk.
  • The money side runs through Trading 212 Markets Ltd in Cyprus, registered with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission as MiCA CASP 21380045KC28948FNE32, so a UK saver is dealing with a Cyprus entity alongside the UK one.

Who each suits

Nutmeg

Who it suits

  • UK investors who want a managed portfolio inside an ISA or a SIPP and accept a single ongoing charge for the service.
  • People who would rather not research individual funds, since the holdings run to etf, esg and cash approaches chosen and held for you.
  • Investors who want a phone line as well as written support, since email, chat and phone includes phone, chat, email and a help centre.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone starting with a small first payment, since the £500 deposit is well above the robo-advisor lower quartile of €0, and Axos Invest begins at $100 in US dollars.
  • Shoppers who want the lowest ongoing charge, since eToro runs a 0% management fee and Vivid Standard charges 0.5% to 1.5%, against Nutmeg's 0.25% to 0.75%.
  • Investors who want accounts in US dollars, because Axos Invest takes $100 in dollars while Nutmeg's £100 to £500 sits in pounds.

Trading 212

Who it suits

  • Beginners and small regular investors who want a low bar to entry, since the minimum deposit is £1 and the app and demo account in fractional shares, demo account and mobile app support a cautious start.
  • UK and European savers who care about holding cost, because the account fee of £0 and the inactivity fee of £0 leave the account free to sit and free to open.
  • Savers who want a tax-wrapped and shared holding together, since isa, sipp and joint covers an ISA, a SIPP and a joint account under one provider.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Not for forex and CFD traders who want a deeper market list: Trading 212 stops at stocks, etfs and forex, while eToro and Vantage cover more of the leveraged side.
  • Not for anyone who needs a no-cost opening: CFI takes a minimum deposit of $0 against the £1 asked here.
  • Not for savers who want a bigger spread of wrappers: the account range is listed as isa, sipp and joint, which does not stretch to every tax-sheltered account type.

Current offers

Nutmeg

Current offer

  • Bonus

    Earn £100 when you invest £1,000: GBP 100 cash reward

    Invest at least £1,000 in one payment into a General Investment Account, Stocks and Shares ISA, Lifetime ISA, Junior ISA or Personal Pension and keep it invested for at least 6 months; new contributions only, transfers excluded; reward paid as unallocated cash within 55 days; new clients only, cannot be combined with other new-client offers

    Source, checked September 26, 2026

Country by country

Nutmeg vs Trading 212
CountryNutmegTrading 212
United KingdomYesNo

Questions about each

Nutmeg

What does Nutmeg charge to manage my money?+

The charge is a single management fee of 0.25% to 0.75%, which sits above the robo-adviser median of 0.35% in this group. There are no set-up, trading or exit fees to add on top. Money can go in from £100 to £500, so the cost is a percentage of what you hold rather than a price per deal.

How much do I need to open an account?+

The minimum deposit is £500, and once the account is open money can go in from £100 to £500. That first payment is the step most readers notice, and it sits above the lower quartile of €0 across robo-advisers here.

Trading 212

What is the minimum deposit to open a Trading 212 account?+

The published minimum deposit is £1, low enough to open and fund in one step. That entry sits under the €4.64 level seen across the brokers compared here, and under the $5 Vantage asks for, so a small first transfer is enough to get going.

Does Trading 212 charge for keeping an account open or leaving it idle?+

The account fee reads £0 and the inactivity fee reads £0, so neither holding the account nor letting it sit dormant is billed on the published sheet. The €10 inactivity level across the brokers compared sits well above that floor, which is where dormant-account charges usually show up.

Trading 212

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10See alternatives