Updated September 29, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

FBS vs WH SelfInvest

FBS scores 9.1 and WH SelfInvest 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

FBS

9.1/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

WH SelfInvest

9.3/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Where FBS and WH SelfInvest differ

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
Compare
FBSFBS
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
WH SelfInvestWH SelfInvest
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Stock trade fee$0Lower$1.90
Account fee$0€0
Inactivity fee$0€0
MarketsStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs, MetalsStocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs, Options, Futures, Bonds
Retail accounts that lose money66.43%76%
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5NanoTrader, TradingView, Trader Workstation, Mobile Apps
Minimum deposit$5Not confirmed
RegulatorsCyprus Securities and Exchange CommissionNot confirmed
Investor protectionEU ICS up to EUR 20,000Not confirmed
EUR/USD spread0.5%Not confirmed
Deposit and withdrawal feesFreeNot confirmed

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • WH SelfInvest scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 9.1.
  • Stock trade fee is lower at FBS: $0 vs $1.90.
  • Markets: only FBS offers Metals.
  • Markets: only WH SelfInvest offers Options, Futures, Bonds.
  • Platforms: only FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.
  • Platforms: only WH SelfInvest offers NanoTrader, TradingView, Trader Workstation.
  • Support channels: only FBS offers Help centre.
  • Features: only WH SelfInvest offers Fractional shares, Copy trading.

Our verdict on each

FBS

Fbs Partners suits readers who want a plain, low cost picture from a firm regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission: the account fee is $0 and the stock trade fee is $0. The EUR/USD spread of 0.5% and the retail loss rate of 66.43% are the figures to weigh before funding.

Read the full FBS review

WH SelfInvest

WH SelfInvest sits in Luxembourg and covers stocks, ETFs, forex, CFDs, options, futures and bonds under an account fee of €0 and an inactivity fee of €0, which suits investors who want many asset classes without a standing charge. Stock dealing is the cost to watch, at $1.90 a trade.

Read the full WH SelfInvest review

Score breakdown

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
AreaFBSWH SelfInvest
Cost9.3Higher9.1The standing fees are flat, at €0 and €0, while the dealing charge of $1.90 a trade pulls the score down.
Offer9.39.5Higher
Trust8.8Not confirmed

How they place

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
RankingFBSWH SelfInvest
Stock and ETF brokers110 of 47186 of 471
Forex brokers47 of 14737 of 147
Low-spread forex brokers45 of 14535 of 145
CFD brokers37 of 12229 of 122

Licences and countries

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
CountryFBSWH SelfInvest
CyprusNot confirmed

Every fact side by side

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
FactFBSWH SelfInvest
FeaturesDemo account, Mobile appDemo account, Fractional shares, Copy trading, Mobile appCovers more
Pricing modelCommission freeNot confirmed
AudienceBeginnersNot confirmed
Legal entityTradestone LimitedNot confirmed
HeadquartersCyprusLuxembourg
Founded2009Not confirmed
Support channelsEmail, Phone, Help centreCovers moreEmail, Phone

Where each stands against the rest

FBS vs WH SelfInvest
FactFBSWH SelfInvestMedian
Minimum deposit$5below the medianNot confirmed$25
Stock trade fee$0at the median$1.90highest quarter$0
Retail accounts that lose money66.43%below the median76%highest quarter72.13%
EUR/USD spread0.5%below the medianNot confirmed0.65%

Median across 135 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

FBS

Pros

  • An account regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission: Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission licenses Tradestone Limited under 331/17, so the contract has a named entity behind it.
  • The stock trade fee is $0 on a commission free model, so dealing in the shares and ETFs inside stocks, etfs and forex carries no ticket charge.
  • The inactivity fee is $0, so a dormant balance is not quietly drained by account charges.

Cons

  • The EUR/USD spread of 0.5% is the charge that lands on every forex and CFD trade, so currency traders feel it more than the flat fees suggest.
  • The minimum deposit of $5 sits above CFI's $0, so readers who want the smallest opening balance have a lower floor elsewhere.
  • The market list stocks, etfs and forex leaves out crypto and futures, which eToro covers in stocks, etfs and forex.

WH SelfInvest

Pros

  • The account fee is €0 and the inactivity fee is €0, so an account left open or left idle is not billed, and the standing cost sits level with Vantage at $0.
  • A single account covers stocks, etfs and forex, so shares, forex, CFDs, options, futures and bonds can be held and traded together.
  • The platform choice runs from NanoTrader, TradingView and Trader Workstation, so the same account can be worked from a desktop terminal or from mobile apps.

Cons

  • Stock dealing costs $1.90 a trade, where eToro charges $0 for its stock dealing.
  • That dealing charge ranks 123 of 161 on our data, while the account fee sits at 1 of 138 and inactivity at 1 of 56, so the standing costs lead the table while dealing sits near the back of it.
  • Support runs on email and phone, so a live chat window and a help centre are not part of the contact options.

Who each suits

FBS

Who it suits

  • Beginners opening a new trading account: the minimum deposit is $5 and the account fee is $0.
  • Readers who hold shares and ETFs alongside forex: stocks, etfs and forex covers that mix on the same account.
  • European readers who want a Cyprus regulated firm: Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission licenses the entity behind the brand.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Readers who want the smallest possible opening balance: CFI takes $0.
  • Readers who need crypto or futures in the same account: eToro lists stocks, etfs and forex, and those lines sit outside stocks, etfs and forex.
  • Readers who want crypto added to a forex, CFD, stock, ETF and metals mix: Vantage covers forex, cfds and stocks.

WH SelfInvest

Who it suits

  • Investors who want shares and leveraged products side by side, since stocks, etfs and forex puts forex, CFDs, options, futures and bonds in the same account.
  • People who split activity between a desktop terminal and mobile apps, since NanoTrader, TradingView and Trader Workstation covers both.
  • Traders who want to test before committing, since demo account, fractional shares and copy trading includes a demo account and fractional shares.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone who mainly wants cheap stock dealing: eToro charges $0 for stock dealing against $1.90 here.
  • Crypto traders, since crypto is missing from stocks, etfs and forex although CFI covers stocks, etfs and forex.

Questions about each

FBS

What does it cost to run an account at Fbs Partners?+

The account fee is $0, the stock trade fee is $0 and the inactivity fee is $0, so nothing is charged for holding the account, dealing in shares or leaving a balance idle. Deposits and withdrawals carry no charge either. What remains on a forex or CFD trade is the spread, quoted at 0.5% on EUR/USD.

How much does the EUR/USD spread cost in practice?+

The EUR/USD spread is 0.5%. On a currency pair that spread is the dealer's charge for opening and closing, so it lands on every position rather than on a ticket line. The stock trade fee of $0 and the account fee of $0 sit alongside it, which makes the spread the number to size positions around.

WH SelfInvest

Does WH SelfInvest charge an account fee?+

The account fee is €0 and the inactivity fee is €0, so there is nothing to pay for holding the account open and nothing for leaving it idle. That is why the brand ranks 1 of 138 on our data for the account fee and 1 of 56 for inactivity.

What does it cost to buy a stock?+

A stock trade costs $1.90, and that is the charge which scales with how often you trade. It ranks 123 of 161 on our data, so anyone dealing in shares regularly will feel it far more than the flat fees. Multiply it by the number of trades you expect.

WH SelfInvest

WH SelfInvest

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10See alternatives