Updated September 28, 2026 · BrokerCue Editorial Team

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo

Alpha Capital Group scores 9.2 and Ftmo 9.6 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Alpha Capital Group

9.2/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Ftmo

9.6/10

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo: the differences

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo
Compare
Alpha Capital GroupAlpha Capital Group
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
FtmoFtmo
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Maximum drawdown4% to 10%10%
Evaluation steps1 step2 step
Account sizes$5,000 to $200,000 simulated$10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000
Payout frequencyBi-weekly or on-demandReward claim from the 14th day after first trade; paid within 1-2 business days after invoice approval
Challenge price$27Not confirmed

Same on both: Profit split (80% to 90%), Daily loss limit (3% to 5%).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Ftmo scores higher overall: 9.6 vs 9.2.
  • Founded is lower at Ftmo: 2015 vs 2021.
  • Support channels: only Ftmo offers Phone.

Our verdict on each

Alpha Capital Group

Alpha Capital Group suits traders who want funded status without long evaluation phases, and traders who can work inside a daily loss cap. With a challenge price of $27 and a 1 step format, the drawdown rule deserves a close read.

Read the full Alpha Capital Group review

Ftmo

FTMO pairs a 2 step evaluation with a fixed maximum drawdown of 10% and a profit split of 80% to 90%, below the 100% offered by Funding Pips. It suits disciplined traders who want clear published rules, a choice of account sizes and broad support coverage.

Read the full Ftmo review

Score breakdown

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo
AreaAlpha Capital GroupFtmo
Cost10.0Entry charge of $27 is at the low end of tracked challenge prices, with a funded split of 80% to 90%.Not confirmed
Offer8.89.4HigherFixed terms on offer: 10% maximum drawdown, 3% to 5% daily loss limit, 2 step evaluation, 80% to 90% profit split.
Trust8.89.7Higher

Positions in our rankings

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo
RankingAlpha Capital GroupFtmo
Prop trading firms11 of 375 of 37

Sources behind this comparison

Alpha Capital Group

  • alphacapitalgroup.uk: 11 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Ftmo

  • ftmo.com: 10 facts, checked September 26, 2026

Every fact side by side

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo
FactAlpha Capital GroupFtmo
Legal entityAlpha Capital Group LimitedFTMO s.r.o.
HeadquartersUnited KingdomCzechia
Founded20212015Lower
Support channelsEmail, Chat, Help centre, CommunityEmail, Chat, Phone, Help centre, CommunityCovers more

Where each stands against the rest

Alpha Capital Group vs Ftmo
FactAlpha Capital GroupFtmoMedian
Challenge price$27lowest quarterNot confirmed$75
Profit split80% to 90%at the median80% to 90%at the median90
Maximum drawdown4% to 10%at the median10%at the median10
Daily loss limit3% to 5%at the median3% to 5%at the median3

Median across 26 listed brokers.

Pros and cons

Alpha Capital Group

Pros

  • The funded split of 80% to 90% keeps the larger share of the account's profit with the trader, and payouts are Bi-weekly or on-demand so the money is not stuck on a long wait.
  • A 1 step evaluation means a single paid phase sits between you and the funded account, so an unsuccessful attempt stays cheap.
  • Account sizes run $5,000 to $200,000 simulated, so a trader can pick the scale of account that matches their own risk appetite.

Cons

  • The split of 80% to 90% leaves part of the profit with the firm, where Apex Trader Funding shares 100%.
  • The daily loss limit of 3% to 5% can end a session before the total drawdown allowance of 4% to 10% has been used, so sizing to the overall figure alone is a mistake.
  • Support runs on email, chat and help centre, with no phone line among them, which leaves fewer routes when a payout needs chasing.

Ftmo

Pros

  • Trading limits are published in plain form: a 10% maximum drawdown and a 3% to 5% daily loss limit, both easy to check against your own risk plan.
  • The drawdown limit stays at 10% across the evaluation, while Alpha Capital Group works with limits of 4% to 10%.
  • Account sizes of $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000 let a trader scale the account to the capital they actually have.

Cons

  • The profit split of 80% to 90% leaves a share of each payout with the firm, where Funding Pips and Apex Trader Funding list 100% and 100%.
  • The daily loss limit of 3% to 5% and the 10% maximum drawdown are both hard, so a weak session can end an evaluation on a larger size than planned.
  • A reward claim only opens after a waiting period counted from the first trade, and payment waits on invoice approval, so the first payout takes patience.

Who each suits

Alpha Capital Group

Who it suits

  • Traders who want to reach a funded account quickly and can hold a daily loss cap.
  • Traders comparing against Funding Pips, whose challenge prices run $29 to $555, and want the cheaper entry.
  • Traders who split profits high and are happy to be paid Bi-weekly or on-demand.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Apex Trader Funding, for anyone who wants to keep the whole profit rather than a 80% to 90% share.
  • Funding Pips, for traders who want a wider spread of challenge prices at $29 to $555 rather than the single $27 charged here.

Ftmo

Who it suits

  • Traders who want the loss limits on the table before they pay: 3% to 5% a day and 10% overall.
  • Traders who want to reach support by email, chat and phone, including phone and chat.
  • Anyone whose capital fits one of the listed sizes, $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000, and who can sit out the claim window after the first trade.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Traders who want to keep every point of profit: Funding Pips and Apex Trader Funding publish 100% and 100% splits, against 80% to 90% here.
  • Traders who want a tighter loss cap: Alpha Capital Group works with a maximum drawdown of 4% to 10%, which suits people who want a lower ceiling than 10%.

Current offers

Ftmo

Current offer

  • Discount code

    20% Off Special deal on $100K 1-Step Challenge: 20% off

    Offer banner on the official site linking to the 1-Step purchase flow; one-time percentage discount on the $100,000 1-Step Challenge.

    Source, checked September 26, 2026

  • Free trial

    FTMO Free Trial: Free

    Free, simplified version of the FTMO Challenge for practice purposes, signup at trader.ftmo.com/free-trial, no limit on repeats.

    Source, checked September 26, 2026

Questions about each

Alpha Capital Group

How much does the Alpha Capital Group challenge cost?+

The challenge price is $27. The median challenge price across tracked prop firms is €56.56, so this sits in the lower part of the market. For comparison, challenge prices at Funding Pips run $29 to $555, which reaches much further at the higher end of that range.

What profit split do traders keep with Alpha Capital Group?+

The profit split is 80% to 90%, which keeps the larger share of the account's profit with the trader and the rest with the firm. The median split across tracked firms is 90%. Apex Trader Funding shares 100%, so weigh that if the share matters more to you than the entry cost.

Ftmo

What does an FTMO challenge cost?+

FTMO lists the account sizes you can enter, $10,000 / $25,000 / $50,000 / $100,000 / $200,000, and the evaluation runs as a 2 step process, so the entry cost follows the size and the stage you buy. For a sense of the market, the median challenge price across the sites compared here is €56.56, and the median for prop firms is €51.74.

How many stages does the evaluation have?+

FTMO runs a 2 step evaluation, so passing takes more than a single stage and a strong result in a single stage does not carry the account through. That structure appears on 40.9% of the sites compared here, against 36.4% for the single-stage model. Each stage is judged against the same 10% maximum drawdown and 3% to 5% daily loss limit.

Ftmo

Ftmo

Higher score in this comparison

9.6/10See alternatives