Global
Risk Management

Trailing Stop-Loss Methods: Percentage, ATR, and Chandelier Exits

Jun 2, 2026

A guide to fixed percentage, ATR, and Chandelier Exit trailing stop strategies for managing risk.

Understanding Trailing Stop-Loss Orders

A trailing stop-loss is a risk management tool that adjusts the exit price as an asset moves in a favorable direction. Unlike a static stop-loss, which remains fixed at a specific price, a trailing stop maintains a set distance from the current market price. This distance can be defined by a percentage, a volatility metric, or a specific price level. The primary function is to lock in profits during an uptrend while limiting losses if the trend reverses. Traders use these orders to remove emotional decision-making from the exit process, allowing the market to dictate when a position is closed.

Fixed Percentage Trailing Stops

The fixed percentage method sets the stop distance as a constant proportion of the asset's price. For example, a trader might set a trailing stop at 5% below the highest price reached since entry. If the asset price rises, the stop level moves up proportionally. If the price falls, the stop level remains unchanged until the price drops enough to trigger the order. This approach is simple to calculate and implement across different asset classes. However, it does not account for market volatility. In highly volatile markets, a fixed percentage might be too tight, causing premature exits during normal price fluctuations. Conversely, in low-volatility environments, the same percentage might be too wide, allowing significant profit erosion before a stop is triggered.

Volatility-Based Stops Using ATR

The Average True Range (ATR) method adjusts the stop distance based on recent market volatility. ATR measures the average price range of an asset over a specific period, typically 14 days. A trader might set a trailing stop at two or three times the current ATR value below the highest price. When volatility increases, the ATR expands, and the stop distance widens to accommodate larger price swings. When volatility decreases, the stop distance tightens. This dynamic approach helps prevent premature exits during volatile periods while maintaining discipline when the market stabilizes. The ATR method requires more calculation than a fixed percentage but offers a more adaptive framework for varying market conditions. It is particularly useful for assets that experience erratic price movements, such as cryptocurrencies or emerging market equities.

Chandelier Exits and Trend Following

The Chandelier Exit is a specific type of trailing stop developed by Chuck LeBeau. It typically uses a multiple of the ATR, often 3x, subtracted from the highest high reached over a set period, usually 22 days. The name refers to the visual appearance of the stop line on a chart, which resembles a chandelier hanging below the price. This method is designed to keep traders in a trend for as long as possible, only exiting when the price reverses significantly. Because it relies on a longer lookback period and a wider multiplier, the Chandelier Exit tends to be less sensitive to short-term noise. It is often used in trend-following strategies where the goal is to capture large moves. However, the wider stops mean that profits may be given back before the order is triggered, which can be difficult for traders with lower risk tolerance.

Selecting a Method for Your Strategy

Choosing between percentage, ATR, and Chandelier Exits depends on the asset's volatility profile and the trader's risk tolerance. A fixed percentage offers simplicity and consistency but may not suit highly volatile assets. ATR-based methods provide a balance between adaptability and discipline, making them suitable for a wide range of market conditions. Chandelier Exits favor long-term trend capture but require the patience to withstand larger drawdowns. When evaluating brokers, consider whether their trading platforms support these specific order types. Some platforms offer built-in ATR indicators and automated trailing stop features, while others may require manual adjustment or third-party tools. Understanding the mechanics of each method allows investors to align their risk management tools with their specific trading objectives and the characteristics of the assets they hold.